Tag Archives: words

when words are too much

image courtesy of too many tabs


I was about half-way through a five-mile run when I heard the crash.  I turned the corner to see a lifeless body in the road, a motorcycle off to the side, and a red Jeep Cherokee pulling over towards the curb.  The next few minutes were busy — a lot happened fast — and I think I remember most of it.  But the happenings of this day are not my point in writing.  Suffice it to say that another guy and I performed CPR, and when the ambulance arrived there was a faint heartbeat but no breathing.  

Our university’s goalkeeper died at the hospital a few hours later.  [My position, oddly enough.]

I hadn’t known he was a Lipscomb student.  I was new at school — transferred in as a junior only a few weeks before — and was still trying to convince myself it was a good decision when all this happened.

I had nightmares for the first few nights.  I couldn’t close my eyes without seeing his face staring blankly back at me.  The next week we had a devotional in the courtyard, and Chris’s friends led us in song and prayer.  I went off to the side to sit down, and leaned against a tree.

A girl (I’d maybe met once) approached.  She sat down next to me and confessed that she didn’t know what to say.  But she put her arm around me, sat quietly, and let me cry for a few minutes.  Then she got up and walked away.

Her response was perfect.  I didn’t need someone to tell me it wasn’t my fault, or that Chris was better off, or that “all things work together for good for those who love the Lord….”  I just needed someone to be there.  That’s it.

Words are so very often overrated.

 [Oh, and I'm not sure I ever told Natalie Montgomery thanks.  Thank you, Natalie.  Your small gesture meant a great deal to me.]

15 Comments

Filed under just thinking

not to bring a sword, but a piece

image courtesy of the journeys project


As Jesus and his disciples were preparing for battle, an argument broke out among the twelve.  It seems James and John were being greedy with weapons, as each wanted to carry more than one pistol.  There were a limited number of guns, though, and all the apostles badly wanted to pack heat.

Peter took aim, saying, “You sons of thunder should know better.  Jesus taught us to share, and you guys are being selfish.”

“Well if you shoot like you swing a sword,” James fired at him, “we’d all be better off with me carrying your piece!  Just ask Malchus.”

Wounded, Peter shot back, “Did you just say that yourself, James?  Or did you beg your mommy to do it for you?  If anyone deserves two guns, it’s me; I walked on water!”

At exactly this moment the Son of man entered the room.

“No one deserves two blasters,” explained Jesus. “Either you take one gun and share the other, or you get none and fare well, brother.  No man can serve both God and cannon.”

When Simon the Zealot heard this he became very sad, because he had many guns.

Then Jesus made Peter, James, and John to go to the front of the line… where they would be the last to get their guns.



If you liked this post, you might also enjoy one of the two series that begin here and here.


9 Comments

Filed under modern-day retelling, slightly humorous or amusing?

brett’s morning blend (12jan11)

I know, I know… you guys are all upset because morning blend is supposed to be a Tuesday feature* — and I replaced it yesterday with a post about Auburn football.  Probably several of you sat down at your computers with your coffee, immediately questioned what day of the week it was, and, confused, counted the days back to Sunday (because we all know that church attendance is the base of our counting).  Most of you then figured out that it was indeed Tuesday and cried a little bit because morning blend was nowhere to be found.  Others of you (Charlie) cried a little bit because Oregon lost.  And still others of you did not attend church services at your local congregation on Sunday — and you’ve only just now realized that today is Wednesday (and that your salvation is in question).

Here are the links:

Islam and Christianity in Sub-Saharan Africa

Blogger Steve Addison offers a quick breakdown of the Pew Forum’s latest report on Christianity and Islam in Africa.  I’m wary of calling the report accurate, and have made a few (poorly worded) comments there.  You can see the the full report here.

Marriage by Phone

Speaking of Islam, did you guys know Islamic law allows you to meet a girl on the internet and get married over the phone, ceremony and all?  Without ever having met in person?  BUT (and this is a very important “but”) the marriage will be declared null and void if the photos your lovely bride sent you were not in fact photos of her.

Family-Friendly Films Top Box Office in 2010

Of the top ten grossing films from last year, not a single one of them was rated ‘R.’  Inception was PG-13, and this writer claims all nine others were “aimed squarely at families.”  I won’t argue that the other nine were not family-friendly (depending on how we define that).

But I think I can make a pretty good argument that the newest Twilight film was not indeed “aimed squarely at families.”  Actually in a 400-seat movie theatre, I can make about 398 good arguments that Twilight was aimed towards teenage girls who know ahead of time when one of the male actor’s is about to take off his shirt — and these 398 arguments of mine show their knowledge of such by chanting with one voice, “Take it off, take it off!”

2011 List of Banished Words

Every year Lake Superior State University produces a list of overused and desperately-in-need-of-banning words.  On this year’s list, among others:

    • epic
    • fail
    • a-ha moment

Mac/Apple Rips Off Picasso

The “Finder” icon from Mac looks an awful lot like a face from one of Picasso’s pieces.  You be the judge.  [And if you know Italian, you'll be able to read the blog post I just sent you to...]

Fast Food: Advertisements Versus Reality

Now, I myself don’t mind because aesthetics count very little in my decisions to, or not to, eat particular food items.  But it’s true that these burgers don’t look anything at all like the photos which “represent” them.  [If these burgers were Muslim, they'd be looking at a nullified marriage right now.]  Also, the blog itself is quite interesting: The Everyday Minimalist.  That is if you don’t mind the picture of a nearly naked woman doing yoga…

P.S. — Tomorrow I start my new series on famous exchanges in the Bible.  I’m really excited about it.  Please check back if you get a chance….

* In actuality, only four of you realized that morning blend happens every Tuesday.  And that’s because you try to remember not to even visit the blog on those days.

11 Comments

Filed under morning blend

but not the hippopotamus

The other day I read a book to Baylor that was new to me.  But Not the Hippopotamus is now one of my very favorite children’s stories.  However, I am puzzled as to why the author chose to begin the story in this way:

A hog and a frog cavort in the bog.  But not the hippopotamus.

Cavort?!  Since when is that a kid word?*  Not that I’m opposing the use of it by toddlers around the world — it just strikes me as odd.  How about:

  • A hog and a frog play in the bog.
  • A hog and a frog dance in the bog.
  • A hog and a frog do a jig in the bog.

But cavort?!  We might as well have said:

  • A hog and a frog gambol in the bog.
  • A hog and a frog carry on with their merrymaking antics in the bog.
  • A hog and a frog calculate and pay their federal income taxes in the bog.

Listen, I’ve got nothing against the book — I think it’s great.  Sandra Boynton is a brilliant writer.  There’s even an awesome plot twist at the end.  A surprise ending in a baby book… the woman’s a genius.

But when I want my daughter learning words like cavort,** I’ll sign her up to take the GRE.

* Not that “hippopotamus” is the easiest word in the world…
** But I also have to wonder how often I choose fancy, religious words when a simpler one would do just fine.


18 Comments

Filed under family, writing

of marathons and misinformation: a lesson in tanzanian communication

A few days ago I posted a “review” of the Rock City Marathon, which I ran on Sunday.  I posted my ideas that day from a very western-dominated worldview for two reasons: 1) That is my default setting for thought.  And 2) most of my readers (all six of you) are American and likely think in a similar fashion.

But Jason Miller, super missionary in Mwanza, Tanzania, shared with me some great thoughts over coffee Monday morning about the news article I’d linked to and how it represented so well Tanzanian communication and values.  Then he left on my blog (while I was driving 11 hours) what might have been an intelligent African response to my own post.  There is a lot to be learned about Tanzanian culture from Jason’s few words on the subject.*  So I am reposting his comment here for all to read.  It’s likely that in the next few days, I’ll attempt a western response to Jason’s African one.  But please feel free to respond while proudly wearing your own American values on your sleeve.

Hey Brett,

I see that you replied last at 6:01. Well, since you were staying at my house, at 6:15 you and I were conversing over coffee when I made the comment that your post represented to a T[anzanian] a very western valued (albeit funny) view of the newspaper article from the Guardian. I then said something like, “If someone googles ‘Rock City Marathon’ I bet your blog comes up in the top five.” You were a little mortified by that possibility. Well, I just googled to make sure…and you are number 5.

So, since I’m privy to the information that you’re traveling all day from Mwanza to Dodoma, and being that after that conversation you were concerned and wanted to add an addendum to your post, I’ll post a comment from the viewpoint of your average Tanzanian forming the jist of our conversation in order to way-lay the concerns of those that are of the sociological viewpoint of a Tanzanian. You can add or subtract later, agree or disagree later.

Just so all you readers who are going to want to defend Brett know, Brett and I are good friends.

Considering the several disparaging comments you levied against the staff writer of the Guardian, they all seem to deal on some level with your over-valuing of truth at all costs. You see, as a white-male westerner (as you can only be since you liked the nick-name “The White Mamba”), you value accuracy and truth more than relationship and decency.

Let me explain. You begin by quibbling with the phrase “all the finest runners” and the word “marathon.” Your first questions, as a westerner, are concerned with the accuracy of these statements; whereas as a Tanzanian, you would have had no questions here, since what right-minded person who considers the feelings of others at all would have so coarsely belittled the effort and ability of those involved by directly accusing them of lying. Moreover, we as Tanzanians understand that the article is representing the best hopes of those involved, and has no direct relation to truth whatsoever.

About starting the race at 7am or later, what Tanzanian wouldn’t want to start later? At 7am it is still cold, is it not, being only 68 degrees F? How would one run in all the clothes needed to stay warm at that early hour?

Furthermore, you westerners obsession with time over relationship continues to confound me. You value this impersonal entity, time, more than you value being, as you westerners say, “in the moment.” Westerners like to talk of being “in the moment,” or being mentally present to those who are in front of them for the time they require their attention (regardless of allegiance to time), but in reality your true values are betrayed by the fact that many chance encounters are ended by the fact that a previous engagement has been arranged. Truly western, that: valuing that which is in the future, or, let’s be honest, the possible, more than valuing that which is right in front of you, or, in the most basic meaning, the real.

Did you ever consider that perhaps the Coke driver simply wanted to spend a little more time with his child that morning instead of rushing off to work because of a “previous engagement?”

And then you land back on accuracy concerning numerical reporting, taking to task the “3000″ involved in the race. Yes, of course, there were more like 300 involved, but what right-minded member of a society worth being a member of would value a random number over the intentions and relationships of those involved in planning this great event. So they said 3000 and there were actually 300…so what? Not a single Tanzanian thought there would be 3000. They are again, like good Tanzanians communicating to other Tanzanians, reporting the best intentions of those involved, not the base reality. Everyone in my neighborhood knows that reality is not worth paying attention to, but that it is intention that matters.

Next you’ll want to tell me that we should judge a man by his actions! No, not even you would be that ridiculous. A man’s intentions and the peculiarities of his situation are much more important than his successes. Everyone knows that. Who in Tanzania knows more than one or two people they could name as successful? Or better yet, someone who is successful and can still named as friend? For we all know, with success so often comes a set of compromised morals.

Anyway, at least it seems from your post that you value children. At least, from a sociological standpoint, we have that in common. Jesus, as well, seemed to value them at the expense, even, of others.

Along those lines, even our own writer, Paul, tells us in Ephesians that once we have matured we will be “speaking the truth in love….” Even Paul, that genius of western logic, understands that truth without love was a sign of immaturity.

How about you?


* “Few words” is relative.

17 Comments

Filed under culture, living in africa

brett’s morning blend (17aug10)

Preaching Noah and the Violence of God

God destroys all the men, women, and children in the world — save eight.  Grown adults desperately clinging to the outside of the one boat in existence while little babies drowned right from the start.  In the end everyone died (except one chosen family).  How do we preach a story like that?  What kind of God does that?  Zack Eswine offers some advice on the subject.

How to Spot a Missionary

Jon Acuff (despite our recent disagreement) writes one of my favorite blogs on the net.  In this little ditty, he shares with us his expert advice on how to spot a missionary.  Among the dead giveaways:  If she’s longwinded and can’t dance, you’re probably looking at a missionary (unless you’re at a Beverly Hills nightclub, in which case you might be trying to hit on Ellen Degeneres).

And if you have a growing suspicion that you yourself might be a missionary, you should probably have a look at this post: you might be a missionary in africa if…

Anatomy of a Christian Hipster

If you’ve found you’re not a missionary, but think you might be a Christian Hipster, this website should help you out a little.  Be sure to check out the interactive photos of real life Christian Hipsters.  I don’t think I fit any of these categories (I’ve only got about 1/16th of hipster in me), but I’d be closest to “The Fugal Collegian,” I suppose.

Words

This video is compliments of Radiolab and NPR — and is pretty amazing:


The Lady’s Brunch Burger

Yesterday was another “Sandwich Monday” on NPR’s Wait Wait.  And don’t get me wrong, I think this sandwich looks absolutely delicious — but why in the world would it be called the LADY’s Brunch Burger?!  I don’t know very many members of the female persuasion who would put this atop their lists for any meal of the day, much less brunch.  Paula Dean’s got some ‘splainin’ to do.


11 Comments

Filed under morning blend